Illinois Matmen Forums Illinois Matmen Forums

Go Back   Illinois Matmen Forums > Archives > Central Illinois Wrestling

View Poll Results: who wins the team title?
Canton 3 7.89%
Limestone 0 0%
Metamora 0 0%
Washington 27 71.05%
Morton 0 0%
East Peoria 2 5.26%
Pekin 6 15.79%
Voters: 38. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old 01-29-2010
89_Dragon 89_Dragon is offline
Junior Varsity
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 41
My bet is that Jacobs (Pekin, 160) wrestles up and so does Magana (171) to get more team points. Could be wrong about that though.
  #62  
Old 01-29-2010
EPwrestler160 EPwrestler160 is offline
Varsity
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by 89_Dragon View Post
My bet is that Jacobs (Pekin, 160) wrestles up and so does Magana (171) to get more team points. Could be wrong about that though.
Is that saying he is going to or just guessing?
  #63  
Old 01-29-2010
ol' man river ol' man river is offline
Varsity
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 767
p..s. no meyer for morton.
  #64  
Old 01-29-2010
Bronco-dad-27 Bronco-dad-27 is offline
VARSITY
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: peoria
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by ol' man river View Post
p..s. no meyer for morton.
thats terrible to hear he is a good wrestler
  #65  
Old 01-29-2010
Bronco-dad-27 Bronco-dad-27 is offline
VARSITY
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: peoria
Posts: 57
Quote:
Originally Posted by EPwrestler160 View Post
So are you saying that there is not anyone from EP that wrestles year round? Are you saying Largent doesnt train year round? Because it certainly sounds like thats what your saying at the end there. And if you want to think thats why im saying that then you can, you have a right to your own opinion. But im actually going on what i've seen and believe. But i guess we will see come tomarrow. I'll deffinitly be there.
no im not saying that nobody from east peoria wrestle year round i was just making the point that born does because you did about largent and i was just pointing out that you keep saying from what you have seen, yes you have seen largent wrestle all season cause he is on your team. you have only seen born wrestle maybe 2 or 3 times because he is not on your team so you couldnt have any idea of how well he is wrestling this year like you could with largent. in the end im sure it will be a good match (if it happens).
  #66  
Old 01-29-2010
Central guy's Avatar
Central guy Central guy is offline
Varsity
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 427
My picks

103 morton
112 morton
119 washington (best match of the day) I am going with the under dog...
125 washington
130 washington
135 canton
140 washington
145 E Peoria going out on a limb
152 washington
160 washington
171 washington
189 metamora
215 E Peoria
285 up for grabs... I will pick Limestone.

Washington wins conference.
Pekin takes second.
  #67  
Old 01-30-2010
89_Dragon 89_Dragon is offline
Junior Varsity
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by EPwrestler160 View Post
Is that saying he is going to or just guessing?
I'm pretty close with the team and I know that one of their main goals is to win conference. If you go into the wrestling room at Pekin High you'll see something along the lines of, "2008-2009 Conference Champs. That was last year. What are you going to do about it today?" While some teams would go for the best matches to get their guys the experience, I think that Pekin's going to move guys around to try to upset Washington. I talked to Jacobs briefly and I'm fairly sure he's wrestling up. But things can always change last second so it's not set in stone.
  #68  
Old 01-30-2010
89_Dragon 89_Dragon is offline
Junior Varsity
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 41
Quote:
Originally Posted by Central guy View Post
My picks

103 morton
112 morton
119 washington (best match of the day) I am going with the under dog...
125 washington
130 washington
135 canton
140 washington
145 E Peoria going out on a limb
152 washington
160 washington
171 washington
189 metamora
215 E Peoria
285 up for grabs... I will pick Limestone.

Washington wins conference.
Pekin takes second.
I find it kind of odd that you have Pekin for second, but give them no championships. I think that Burling, Hanna, Holeman, Jacobs, and Magana will all get championship matches, and that Pekin is going to have at least one or two champions Also, 119 is a stacked bracket!
  #69  
Old 01-30-2010
Central guy's Avatar
Central guy Central guy is offline
Varsity
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 427
Quote:
Originally Posted by 89_Dragon View Post
I find it kind of odd that you have Pekin for second, but give them no championships. I think that Burling, Hanna, Holeman, Jacobs, and Magana will all get championship matches, and that Pekin is going to have at least one or two champions Also, 119 is a stacked bracket!
lolol... Me to.. You can get second and not win a championship.. Out of the ones you mention Magana has the best shot.. Is Jocobs going to beat Reel? Are you going to beat Rice? Only way Burling wins if he goes 12 and I am pretty sure he has lost that certification at the morton tournament. Maybe not. Maybe Jacobs bumbed him up.. NOT sure why you would do this... Did you not see the dual between Washington and Pekin. I thought that might have something to do it some... Anyway time will tell...
Good luck and see you there..




I bet I am right on one thing... Washington wins conference....
  #70  
Old 01-30-2010
Celtic50's Avatar
Celtic50 Celtic50 is offline
Varsity
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Peoria, Il
Posts: 292
Was unable to go watch today since I just brought the wife and and new baby home from the hospital. So if anyone has any updates please share.
__________________
Technique makes em weak!
Sponsored Links
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.